As India approaches the expiry of a decades-long freeze on parliamentary seat allocation in 2026, the next delimitation exercise is set to reshape the country’s democratic and federal landscape. Meant to ensure fair representation by adjusting constituencies based on population shifts, delimitation also raises concerns about regional imbalances. With the delayed 2021 Census still pending, uncertainty surrounds the process, but its potential impact is already fueling debate.
The Mechanics of Delimitation
Delimitation is not just a technical exercise—it is central to India’s democracy. Governed by Articles 82 and 170 of the Constitution, it ensures that Lok Sabha and State Assembly constituencies reflect demographic realities. This process is carried out by an independent Delimitation Commission, typically led by a retired Supreme Court judge, along with the Chief Election Commissioner and State Election Commissioners. The process redraws boundaries and adjusts seat allocations based on the latest Census data. Its orders, once finalized, carry the force of law, immune from judicial challenge (No one can challenge it in any court) - a safeguard for impartiality, though not without critique.
India has conducted delimitation four times since Independence—in 1952, 1963, 1973, and 2002. The last exercise, based on the 2001 Census, redrew boundaries but kept the total number of Lok Sabha seats at 543. This freeze, initially imposed in 1976 to promote population control, has continued even as India’s population surged from 54.8 crore in 1971 to an estimated 145 crore in 2025. As a result, the average number of people represented by an MP has ballooned from 11 lakh in 1971 to over 27 lakh today, creating a serious imbalance in representation.
A Nation Divided by Numbers
The upcoming delimitation, expected to rely on the 2021 Census (whenever completed), will directly address these disparities. Projections suggest a significant shift in political power. Uttar Pradesh, with a population likely exceeding 25 crore, may see its Lok Sabha seats increase from 80 to 143 in a larger House of around 848 seats. Bihar’s seats could jump from 40 to 79. In contrast, Tamil Nadu, which has controlled its population growth, might increase only from 39 to 76—far less than the northern states. Southern states, contributing 35% of India’s GDP with just 18% of its population, fear a dilution of their parliamentary voice.
This north-south divide is not new. The 1976 freeze aimed to reward states like Tamil Nadu and Kerala for population control, but its expiry threatens to “punish” them instead. Tamil Nadu Chief Minister M.K. Stalin has termed delimitation a “looming threat,” convening all-party meetings to strategize resistance. Southern leaders argue that their success in education, healthcare, and economic growth should not cost them political clout. Conversely, northern states see their population-driven gains as a democratic right, amplifying their long-standing dominance in national politics.
Federalism at the Crossroads
Beyond numbers, delimitation raises fundamental questions about India’s federal balance. A significantly altered Lok Sabha composition could marginalize smaller states, especially in the northeast, affecting resource allocation and policy influence. The Rajya Sabha provides some counterbalance, but its limited legislative power cannot fully offset a skewed lower house. Critics warn of a “northern hegemony” that could deepen regional tensions.
However, continuing the freeze is not a viable solution. The current system has led to constituencies of vastly different sizes - some with over 30 lakh voters and others with fewer than 5 lakh—undermining the principle of equal representation. Expanding the Lok Sabha to 1,000 or even 1,400 seats could accommodate population growth without reducing any state’s existing seats. The new Parliament building, designed to hold 888 MPs, suggests that an expansion is being considered. However, such a change would require constitutional amendments and broad political consensus, both of which remain uncertain.
Layered Complexities
Delimitation’s challenges are compounded by intersecting issues. The 106th Amendment (2023), reserving 33% of seats for women, will take effect post-delimitation, demanding meticulous planning to integrate gender equity with territorial adjustments. Reservation for Scheduled Castes (SCs) and Tribes (STs), adjusted per population proportions, will further reshape constituencies. Meanwhile, the delayed 2021 Census—postponed due to the pandemic and yet to commence—casts doubt on the timeline and data reliability.
Politically, the exercise is a minefield. Regional parties in the south (e.g., DMK, LDF, BRS, YSRCP) and northeast fear a loss of leverage, while national parties like the BJP and Congress, with strong northern bases, stand to gain. While the Delimitation Commission operates independently, accusations of gerrymandering and political bias are inevitable. Legal safeguards prevent judicial intervention, ensuring swift implementation but leaving limited avenues for grievances.
Searching for Balance
Can India reconcile these tensions? Several proposals vie for attention. Some advocate retaining the 543-seat cap and redistributing within it, preserving southern influence but sacrificing voter equity. Others push for a larger Lok Sabha, a logistical and political challenge that could still favor the north. A novel idea—weighting representation by development metrics like literacy or GDP—seeks to reward progress over population, though defining such criteria risks endless debate. Splitting large states like Uttar Pradesh into smaller units could decentralize power, but this remains a distant prospect.
The Delimitation Commission, when constituted, will wield immense responsibility. Its public consultations, a hallmark of past exercises, must amplify diverse voices—rural and urban, northern and southern, populous and sparse. Transparency will be key to quelling fears of bias.
A Defining Moment for Indian Democracy
Delimitation is more than a technical adjustment—it is a test of India’s democratic and federal resilience. If executed well, it can restore the principle of “one person, one vote, one value,” adapting representation to a vastly different India from that of 1971. If mishandled, it risks deepening regional fault lines and fueling perceptions of inequity. As 2026 nears, India faces a crucial choice: how to balance demographic realities with its diverse, federal structure. The decision made now will shape the country’s political landscape for decades to come.
Post a Comment